data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a288a/a288a55b4f8e2dc52506cb3cd306bdf533cd3042" alt="Imac pro vs imac 2017"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f5cf/6f5cfe7188b79232bf610b8fc3580b9e70a0d3d0" alt="imac pro vs imac 2017 imac pro vs imac 2017"
- IMAC PRO VS IMAC 2017 UPGRADE
- IMAC PRO VS IMAC 2017 FULL
- IMAC PRO VS IMAC 2017 PROFESSIONAL
- IMAC PRO VS IMAC 2017 MAC
Two mid-range workstation GPUs (as found in the Mac Pro) are not enough for some tasks.
IMAC PRO VS IMAC 2017 UPGRADE
Further, it’s critically important for there to be an upgrade path-particularly with the GPU. Most workflows call for a very powerful processor and at least one very powerful graphics card. But workloads didn’t materialize to fit that as broadly as we hoped.īeing able to put larger single GPUs required a different system architecture and more thermal capacity than that system was designed to accommodate. We designed a system that we thought with the kind of GPUs that at the time we thought we needed, and that we thought we could well serve with a two GPU architecture… that that was the thermal limit we needed, or the thermal capacity we needed. I think we designed ourselves into a bit of a thermal corner, if you will. Executive Craig Federighi said the following in the aforementioned Mac desktop pow-wow with press: Luckily, Apple has been forthcoming on that point. To assess the iMac Pro, we should first consider why the Mac Pro was not successful. While the iMac offers plenty for most people working in Web design or for people who are editing video for publication on social platforms like Facebook, more is needed for other tasks, like editing feature films and 8K digital video, VR development, scientific modeling, special effects work, and more. I often see wall-to-wall iMacs when visiting their offices, studios, and edit bays. Case in point: I live in Los Angeles, and many of my friends work in creative roles like video production or interactive design in the entertainment industry or at agencies. For most professionals, the existing iMac is sufficient. Advertisementįurther Reading Apple is completely redesigning the Mac Pro… again But it’s also a bit more than that in some areas that count. It’s another step in the right direction for some of those same professionals, even though it doesn’t address every need the Mac Pro used to. Apple tried to drive that point home by inviting professionals from various disciplines to showcase it in December.Īfter spending some time with the new release, I can confirm the iMac Pro is an impressive machine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b7d/79b7dd49bdb33857c9cb5fb01bb0d264eddf1687" alt="imac pro vs imac 2017 imac pro vs imac 2017"
Starting at $4,999 with an 8-core Intel Xeon processor, 32GB of high-end memory, 1TB of solid state storage, and a Radeon Pro Vega 56 GPU with 8GB of HBM2 video memory, the iMac Pro is decidedly not just a consumer machine.
IMAC PRO VS IMAC 2017 PROFESSIONAL
Two such assurances were made: Apple would overhaul the Mac Pro sometime after 2017, taking into account the mistakes it made in 2013, and it would double down on the iMac as a professional machine.Īt first, we believed the latter of those simply meant a strong commitment to keeping the standard iMac up to date, but Apple soon announced the iMac Pro. Some pro users’ discontent had reached a point at which assurances were needed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b60a1/b60a1da1fa350b2c04628601477280a638d29751" alt="imac pro vs imac 2017 imac pro vs imac 2017"
This was a surprise, as Apple usually does not discuss its plans for products unless they are close to being ready for release.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a396/5a396570001ceaeaf999e8dc223aae0ede33a706" alt="imac pro vs imac 2017 imac pro vs imac 2017"
In April of last year, Apple invited press to discuss its plans for pro desktops, but it didn’t have specific products to announce at that time.
IMAC PRO VS IMAC 2017 FULL
And when Apple overhauled its video editing software and released Final Cut Pro X in 2011, many editors were turned off by its compromises.īut things are definitely looking up: 2016 brought a strong refresh of the MacBook Pro lineup, and Final Cut Pro X has gradually been updated to address and exceed most professionals’ expectations, including a significant release this past December that improved the color tools and added full support for HEVC and 360 video. The MacBook Pro went with few substantial updates for a long period of time after 2012. The current Mac Pro received a lukewarm reception when it began shipping in 2013, and it has been preserved in amber ever since. Some high-end professional Mac users are frustrated, and they have been for years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a288a/a288a55b4f8e2dc52506cb3cd306bdf533cd3042" alt="Imac pro vs imac 2017"